[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gcc
Steve,
Thanks alot. I will probably include it when I start upgrading stuff to Woody
this weekend. I really didn't have the opprotunity to talk to anyone about
the gcc 3 series as gcc really doesn't come up often in this world of
binaries (bless their souls), but I still like doing compiling when I can,
despite the pain in uninstalling them if I want to later.
Cheers!
Sarah
On Friday 11 January 2002 22:49, stephen s fine wrote:
> Hi Sarah,
> Upto now gcc-3.0 has worked without any problems.I also have gcc-2.95 but I
> dont use it..I started using
> gcc-3.0 almost as soon as it appeared in sid and have had no problems
> somewhat to my surprise.I do make
> sure that all the necesary programs are uptodate particularly binutils and
> modutils.I make a very simple kernel
> and that may be the reason it works.It would be nice to here how you get on
> with it.
> all the best
> Steve Fine
>
> > Steve,
> >
> > Do you run 3.0 alone or do you also run 2.95/2.96? I understand that they
> > can coexist. What sort of problems have you had and are they localized to
> > certain types of compiles? I have contemplated having it in my system as
> > an option, etc.
> >
> > Sarah
> >
> > On Friday 11 January 2002 03:39, stephen s fine wrote:
> > > Hi Jason,
> > > My experience with gcc-3.0 has been upto now positive for compiling
> > > my kernels.I combine it with pentiumbuilder to optimise it.I think be
> > > careful with it for other compiles but Icertaintly feel it is worth
> > > trying
> > > just for the learning experience as oneday it will be the new standard
> > > and is probably good to learn it now.
> > > Regards
> > > Steve Fine
> >
> > --
> > The archive is at https://www.libranetlinux.com/archive.html
> > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
> > with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE.
--
The archive is at https://www.libranetlinux.com/archive.html
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE.