[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Help Libranet test version 2.0 installer

I learned from the experience that you have to "right click" to get the "iso" to
download to a file, something I didn't know before; and I also learned that it
took about five tries to download a version with the proper "md5sum".  I also
learned about the "md5sum" and how to use it.  Finally I learned from an
expenditure of time it's better to buy a Linux distribution than to spend a
couple of days down loading it.

Libranet wrote:

> I guess the lesson here is we all make mistakes.
> It's a mistake to put anyone down.
> It's a mistake to get angry.
> It's probably a mistake to talk about mistakes :)
>
> This is a great group, let's shake hands, accept each other and get on
> with the business of being the best mailing list there is.
>
> We have already received some reports from those of you testing the 2.0
> install and the info gleaned is very useful.  If all goes well and after
> a few changes based on the reports and a few other things we still have
> to do we should have 2.0 out around month end or a bit after.
>
> Jon
>
> rod wrote:
> >
> > I said I'm sorry. Not good enough. Fine
> >
> > Credentials: you want mine - I'm an umemployed truck driver.
> >
> > If your resume is as carefully worded as your post then I take it your
> > umemployed too.
> >
> > Rod
> >
> > Doug Byfield wrote:
> > >
> > > rod wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, no personal hostility intended.
> > > >
> > > > You made a mistake posting a private response to a public mailing list.
> > >
> > > So what? You no doubt never make mistakes. Whether you know it or not,
> > > that is what you are implying.
> > >
> > > > I make a mistake pointing out the incongruities of claiming to have a
> > > > processor which doesn't exist followed by a list of credentials.
> > >
> > > A deliberate personal attack at my expense. You knew exactly what you
> > > were doing.
> > >
> > > > Regardless of what credentials either of us have, 
> > >
> > > You seem to be fixated on credentials. I only mentioned my
> > > qualifications as an indication to Libranet of why I could possibly be
> > > useful
> > > as a beta tester. As I previously mentioned, the post was not meant for
> > > the list. You take one honest mistake and try and build some sort of
> > > federal case about who knows what?
> > >
> > > That's rather unfriendly and very childish. How would you like to have
> > > (some) of your qualifications
> > > and character called into question for absolutely trivial purposes.
> > >
> > > Your apology is ***NOT*** accepted as I do not think it is sincere.
> > > Further posts from you shall be ignored, as of now.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The archive is at https://www.libranetlinux.com/archive.html
> > > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
> > > with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE.
> >
> > --
> > The archive is at https://www.libranetlinux.com/archive.html
> > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
> > with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE.
>
> --
> Libranet GNU/Linux - The TOP Desktop
> https://www.libranetlinux.com
>
> --
> The archive is at https://www.libranetlinux.com/archive.html
> To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
> with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE.

-- 
The archive is at https://www.libranetlinux.com/archive.html
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE.